HOW TO LAND ON THE MOON - Smarter Every Day 250

30 Th01, 2021
1 286 445 lượt xem

Get 1st Audiobook + full access to the Plus Catalog for free when you try Audible for 30 days www.audible.com/smarter or TXT smarter to 500500
Click here if you're interested in subscribing: bit.ly/Subscribe2SED
⇊ Click below for more links! ⇊
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GET SMARTER SECTION
A very special thank you to Wayne Ottinger
www.aletro.org/
Check out the AMAZING website by Ben Feist that synchronizes all Apollo data:
www.apolloinrealtime.org/
I had to find a lot of archival footage to make this video. Thanks to Devin for helping me find the original Apollo LLTV footage from Ellington.
A special thank you to twitter.com/steveslater1987 for providing the footage and audio of the Neil Armstrong Interview after flying the LLTV.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tweet Ideas to me at:
twitter.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day on Facebook
facebook.com/SmarterEveryDay
Smarter Every Day on Patreon
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day On Instagram
instagram.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day SubReddit
www.reddit.com/r/smartereveryday
Ambiance, audio and musicy things by: Gordon McGladdery
www.ashellinthepit.com/
ashellinthepit.bandcamp.com/
If you feel like this video was worth your time and added value to your life, please SHARE THE VIDEO!
If you REALLY liked it, feel free to pitch a few dollars Smarter Every Day by becoming a Patron.
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Warm Regards,
Destin

NHẬN XÉT
  • We're going back to the moon, and we're going to need to train Astronauts how to land. This video is the result of trying to understand that control problem better. in the next video of this series, I'll show you footage from an actual NASA Lunar Lander software test I participated in many years ago. Also, I'd like to say express grateful I am to everyone who supports Smarter Every Day on Patreon at www.patreon.com/smartereveryday . If you've never considered being a Patreon of Smarter Every Day, then feel free to click the link if you'd like to see what it's all about. If not, then no big deal! I'm grateful that you're here. Warm Regards, Destin

    SmarterEveryDaySmarterEveryDayTháng trước
    • Pshhhhh old news. I could land on the moon.

      Gavin AndStuffGavin AndStuffNgày trước
    • Yyhqara6 you

      adam philpadam philp2 ngày trước
    • @MaGaO true, but the software to land reliably is fairly new and getting better all the time. Most of the failed Mars landings happened without the benefit of the sensors and algorithms available now. It's still best to train the pilots of course.

      AlmaadinAlmaadin4 ngày trước
    • @Almaadin Many Mars probes have crashed. If humans are aboard, it makes sense to train them just in case.

      MaGaOMaGaO4 ngày trước
    • @Almaadin that was done on earth..so gullible lol. Mars supposedly is 1% density of earth atmosphere. which means no air. an you need air to slow parachute and need air for lift when they eventually fly helicopter drone. so the impossible without air debunks your Mars landing 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😭😭

      hernan jimenezhernan jimenez4 ngày trước
  • RIP Neil Armstrong. Yes it's been 9 years, but he was all of us.

    nxlxnnxlxn10 phút trước
  • 1:45

    R ЯR Я6 giờ trước
  • "this video WERE SENDING LINCON TO THE MOON"

    Saran O.pSaran O.p10 giờ trước
  • So they essentially made a CNC machine that controls the craft?

    Sudeep RSudeep R12 giờ trước
  • NASA : Does all of this Some incel on the internet : "MoOn LaNdInG wAs FaKe!"

    Darth InsidiousDarth Insidious12 giờ trước
  • I’m looking forward to seeing more videos on returning to the moon. Especially to see what the engineers come up with for a test vehicle to fly here on earth.

    Michael CondonMichael Condon16 giờ trước
  • Nasa openly admits that humans cannot safely travel through the Van Allen Belts.... Yet this problem was solved in 1969-1972. What gives?

    John Doe p144.1John Doe p144.1Ngày trước
    • @Atlas I hear what your saying but at the same time the moon landing was THE most significant scientific achievement in human history... Wouldn't you think that is something that would be held onto and cherished for generations?

      John Doe p144.1John Doe p144.119 phút trước
    • @John Doe p144.1 It's a shame they lost the original tapes. But I supposed it made sense for them to be erased, since the video signal had been archived elsewhere and keeping telemetry around isn't standard.

      AtlasAtlasGiờ trước
    • @Atlas OK, fair enough. What about the fact that Nasa "lost" over 13,000 reels of telemetry data. Also contributing to the official explanation as to why we haven't been back to the moon.

      John Doe p144.1John Doe p144.1Giờ trước
    • @John Doe p144.1 Not really. The rocket used in the Apollo program is no longer manufactured. The last Saturn V was made nearly half a century ago. Can't send people beyond LEO without a a massive rocket.

      AtlasAtlas2 giờ trước
    • @Atlas don’t you find it a bit peculiar that we could travel 238,000 miles into space(Apollo mission) but now the farthest we can send MAN into space is 1200 miles (Low Earth Orbit)?

      John Doe p144.1John Doe p144.12 giờ trước
  • The Plan is good! Hopefully it will happen soon! I would like to see human beings will be traveling to the Moon for their vacations and back to the earth! And then Human being will develop the advantage technologies to travel to other planets to live, working, vacation, ...... and back to the Mother Earth!

    chau dochau doNgày trước
  • I don't know about you.... but these prototype propulsion techniques, if they were ever snatched by the military and repurposed for military vehicles,.... and IF one, or some, if any, of those prototypes were seen by the public.... there's a really good chance they'd look like flying saucers, to the layman. think about it... 1964 era, middle of the space race, lots of UFO sightings, and now we know that NASA had a *FREAKING VTOL PROTOTYPE* ?!?!?!??!

    NighthawkNighthawkNgày trước
  • The immense drawbridge laparoscopically kill because submarine coincidentally jail above a tame parent. big, moldy slice

    Chris GonzalezChris GonzalezNgày trước
  • Am I missing something here? Why wouldn't they try to evenly fill the system with helium compartments or vacuum? Would that be beyond the limit of how much that volume could lift compared to the weight of the lunar lander?

    Zoltán KozmaZoltán KozmaNgày trước
  • Wayne is a national treasure. I love AMERICA!!!!!!!

    Travis JamesTravis JamesNgày trước
  • Among us??!!!

    DarpDarpNgày trước
  • My pal Jonathan Dimock works for NASA. He’s the man who speaks to the president re NASA biz. My pal Johnathan had zeroooo experience to have got this job....

    FILM N SHOOT COFILM N SHOOT CONgày trước
  • The X-14 is basically a copy of the British Hawker Siddeley P.1127. Which later became the Harrier Jump jet.

    The Revolution Will Not Be TelevisedThe Revolution Will Not Be TelevisedNgày trước
  • 1:44 sus

    Dwagin ConDwagin ConNgày trước
  • The lumpy gender phenomenologically request because plastic univariately grin through a acoustic grain. wiry, clammy magazine

    Vincent PangVincent PangNgày trước
  • How did they know the lunar gravitational force before going to the moon?

    Who FartedWho FartedNgày trước
  • Эти "проэкты"-возможность воровать общие деньги,играть во взрослые игрушки и не быть наказанным,а быть "уважаемыми космическими ворами" Я предпологаю.что верхушка США и СССР были в сговоре и много лет смеялись над доверчивыми гражданами...

    Ася ГумероваАся ГумероваNgày trước
  • We all see drones, and the amazing technology they use to fly straight, steady, and in some cases, autonomously. I'm sure there is a tie-in here.

    Chas WolfChas WolfNgày trước
  • Didnt the Harrier fly in 1967?

    Brandon RoutierBrandon RoutierNgày trước
  • What actually happens on the moon landing(s) low-key confirmed by his guest Ben Feist is that the Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) does all of the flying until final approach where Armstrong and other astronauts use the rate-of-decent mode (P66), a mode not unlike drones for the home market where the stabilization is handled by the AGC and Neil uses the fly by wire stick to control horizontal velocity, avoid a boulder field and then bring bring the horizontal velocity to zero; another two switches can speed up or slow down the computers rate of descent in increments of one foot per second. I know the LLTV also had a computer. How similar was it's stabilization and controls to the actual LEM and the AGC's P66?

    djmipsdjmipsNgày trước
  • Man, the engineer of the LLTV, what a treasure!

    el blanco _el blanco _Ngày trước
  • 1:45 1:58

    Dylan Wager MusicDylan Wager MusicNgày trước
  • i dont want to be apart of this planet anymore

    Adam ArmstrongAdam Armstrong2 ngày trước
  • 4:06 the the angle dynamically shook with his hands, now that's detail.

    TheEmeraldSwordTheEmeraldSword2 ngày trước
  • This was an amazing video. Thank you. Understanding the why truly is as pertinent as the how. If you understand the why, then engineers can use updated techniques if possible instead of just repeating work arounds.

    Kerrie ArkwellKerrie Arkwell2 ngày trước
  • The communists now in charge want nothing to do with moon landings anyway, so...

    Dan BertucciDan Bertucci2 ngày trước
  • I don't even drink and I want the lunar shot glass

    SlayerofFictionSlayerofFiction2 ngày trước
  • I really do not see the point. The next one will be landed by ai.

    Gert KrugerGert Kruger2 ngày trước
  • amogus

    KatzRoolKatzRool2 ngày trước
  • 4:30 "and if there were no drag.." If there were no drag then there would be no thrust/movement. Just like if there were no weight/gravity there would be no lift.

    DrCash7DrCash72 ngày trước
  • Fek

    DrCash7DrCash72 ngày trước
  • Would be quite impossible to control Starship HLS by hand. Will be autonomous.

    EphraimEphraim2 ngày trước
  • NASA scientists shoulda just played Kerbal Space Program. I was landing on the Mun as a teenager.

    DhoulmegusDhoulmegus2 ngày trước
  • Well done video, learned a lot, (like there are still people that think we didn’t go to the moon, and the earth is flat. I’m sure there are still those that think Hitler didn’t murder millions of people in death camps...) My question is, why go back to the moon? What’s there that we can benefit people? It will cost billions of dollars, tax dollars, just to say we can it? It’s a moon with ... not much on it. The distances to leave our solar system to anyway else are just too far away. Sorry, this isn’t Star Trek, or some other fantasy TV show... .

    strshooterstrshooter2 ngày trước
  • Nah uh, they didn't "make sure velocity is zero when touching the surface". They had probes sticking out of lander which, when the probes touched the surface, automatically shut the engine down (while still some meters above the ground), so the lander gently dropped to the ground.

    maksphoto78maksphoto782 ngày trước
  • 1:58 among us 🤑🤑🤙👌👍

    Doritos XDDoritos XD2 ngày trước
  • Your questions and the way his eyes lit up. Surprised and also happy to see someone younger understanding his knowledge. Awesome

    Kevin PalmerKevin Palmer2 ngày trước
  • Mr. Ottinger is SO COOL. Man, you just know he has countless other amazing stories.

    Spo8Spo83 ngày trước
  • The wild patricia univariably influence because belief exemplarily sigh unlike a flashy comic. aromatic, lethal lyocell

    kkcsak ndclonkkcsak ndclon3 ngày trước
  • Please do a video on the X-14

    OmadaisOmadais3 ngày trước
  • Back to the moon? 😅

    The Bloody TruthThe Bloody Truth3 ngày trước
  • Comment for algorithm.

    Ciorram1Ciorram13 ngày trước
  • I confess, Mr. Ottinger make me laugh a few times. What a great man

    Leandro GogolaLeandro Gogola3 ngày trước
  • 1:45 when the impostor is sus

    Dadly25Dadly253 ngày trước
    • I knew there'd be at least one lol

      Ron BurghandyRon Burghandy12 giờ trước
  • Destin, I have a friend who has an LLTV sitting in his shed at work. I was fortunate enough to get a tour of his "work" and I can honestly say as much fun as it looks... yeah, no... His work is the same AFRC mentioned in your video. I was most impressed by the Peroxide thrusters mounted on every corner and axis of the unit. A tour of the Armstrong facility was the most incredible thing I have had the opportunity to experience. if you are ever there ask about the LLTV and perhaps they can take you to the closet for a look see. God Bless you man, I love your take on science.

    DavyBoySmithDavyBoySmith3 ngày trước
  • We aren’t going back to the moon, not with lunchbox Joe in power.

    Egon PaxEgon Pax3 ngày trước
  • Everybody know Apollo is a big lie

    gordonfree mangordonfree man3 ngày trước
    • Wrong

      AtlasAtlas3 ngày trước
  • AMONG US!!! HE SAID IT

    Binky CarolinaBinky Carolina3 ngày trước
  • @ 5:45 ---> food for thought, the Harrier Jump Jet was first tested in 1967 and introduced into service in '69... 😉

    John BravoJohn Bravo3 ngày trước
  • Why not installing a helium baloon, that lifts 5/6 of the lander's weight?

    Florian WalterFlorian Walter3 ngày trước
  • at this point this man knows too much to be safe 🙏😂

    Super SongSuper Song3 ngày trước
  • Where is the loud roar of the rocket when you hear them calmly talking as lunar is landing?

    Ryan RichRyan Rich3 ngày trước
    • @Atlas nms was tight

      Ryan RichRyan Rich3 ngày trước
    • It's a pressure fed engine firing in a vacuum, come on.

      AtlasAtlas3 ngày trước
  • I would assume the lander's computer will perform the descent and landing in Artemis program.

    HirvieläinHirvieläin3 ngày trước
  • Why do we need manual landing when we sent multiple rovers to mars and it has ability to auto land with high precision

    Suphakrit PhantharatSuphakrit Phantharat3 ngày trước
  • 15:55 oh my ghaad

    Bogdan BogdanBogdan Bogdan3 ngày trước
  • 1:45 kinda sus....

    Bread SpreaderBread Spreader3 ngày trước
  • They actually planned on hitting the moon harder, the crunch pistons on the legs didn't get crunched all the way, that's why their steps are more awkward than usual, edit, because the ladder was hooked on the leg

    PatarPatar3 ngày trước
  • Hahaha cant wait til you debunk it by looking into it :)

    Rooster OriginalRooster Original3 ngày trước
    • @DrCash7 there really isn't

      AtlasAtlas2 ngày trước
    • @Atlas nOtHinG to DeBuNK heRe FolKS

      DrCash7DrCash72 ngày trước
    • There's nothing to debunk.

      AtlasAtlas3 ngày trước
  • How? miniatures and a sound stage...

    britshellbritshell3 ngày trước
  • That was fascinating! Very few people are qualified to call Neil Armstrong an idiot! lol

    mikencomikenco3 ngày trước
  • I think what you're saying, that we need to learn about *why* decisions were made, is really the root of the "teach a man to fish" adage, and it's such a huge issue with the way I see things being taught. Don't give people the answer, give people the tools to find the answer.

    The InternetThe Internet4 ngày trước
  • Folks at NASA are probably taking notes rn.

    Phineas GPhineas G4 ngày trước
  • Why does the velocity have to be zero upon landing? Why not near zero?

    Black PantherBlack Panther4 ngày trước
  • You're making it too easy for tomorrow's kids, they will look like geniuses but instead it was all on youtube.

    LavalambtronLavalambtron4 ngày trước
    • The power of technology.

      Some OnesSome Ones3 ngày trước
  • never went to the moon brah. hash tag moon landing hoax

    Laura WhiteLaura White4 ngày trước
    • @Laura White I have better things to do than watch conspiracy videos. That said, I never came across a good hoaxer argument.

      AtlasAtlas4 ngày trước
    • Atlas gee what a convincing retort Atlas. See “American Moon” on YT and then try to tell me it’s not possible that something’s up with the official narrative.

      Laura WhiteLaura White4 ngày trước
    • wrong

      AtlasAtlas4 ngày trước
  • You are truly a treasure! I so appreciate all of your videos, they are some of the most wholesome and informative media out there.

    David MadsenDavid Madsen4 ngày trước
  • 1:58

    Ian ThorntonIan Thornton4 ngày trước
  • 1:58 amongus

    AsophosAsophos4 ngày trước
    • 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳

      Some OnesSome Ones3 ngày trước
  • 1:44 I can't take this anymore make the pain stop

    WyrylkaWyrylka4 ngày trước
    • Kinda sus

      BearsBears3 ngày trước
  • 1:45

    Aidan GavinAidan Gavin4 ngày trước
  • Thanks for the tutorial, just got invited to a Martian party. Heading out tomorrow night.

    Konnies EggKonnies Egg4 ngày trước
  • Another great video. It would be interesting to know more about the rocket motor that was on the lander and got it back to the orbiter. I had read something where the NASA engineers made it as simple as possible; without any electrical connections to reduce points of failure. It was basically just a mixing of two (2) chemicals by means of the turning of two (2) mechanical valves. Thanks in advance.

    goutvols103goutvols1034 ngày trước
  • I flew a test device in Grumman hangar 5 over a mosaic set of lunar photos. All I had was a mockup of the LM cockpit. I made 3 test landing attempts for evaluation data. 50 years later I toured the hangar at the Cape Canaveral facility and in an alcove next to the Saturn V rocket was the same unit I tested at the Grumman facility. I worked at Grumman for 30+ years on the A-6 Intruder , the F-14 Tomcat,and The JSTARS . Fun years!

    Carl CarterCarl Carter4 ngày trước
  • There's only three ways to go to the Moon, or one. Step one, resurrect Stanley Kubrick. Step two, rent al large studio in the desert. Step three, buy all media and political influencers to give it credibility. Or Get a bunch of wicked smaht guys to get'em there.

    The Obsolete ManThe Obsolete Man5 ngày trước
  • U said among us a lot

    Traci WagnonTraci Wagnon5 ngày trước
  • Excellent. Great job. I know a lot more about lunar landing than I did before watching this. Sign me up!

    lungoteverelungotevere5 ngày trước
  • 1:59 among us

    Tampa BlushTampa Blush5 ngày trước
  • 1:45 amongus

    Tampa BlushTampa Blush5 ngày trước
  • 1:45

    Jeremy HopkinsJeremy Hopkins5 ngày trước
  • Boots on the moon.

    Bradyn AustinBradyn Austin5 ngày trước
  • 1:45 , 1:59

    JPazerJPazer5 ngày trước
  • 1:45

    JPazerJPazer5 ngày trước
  • Hey, I know this video is about the moon, but I have had this question on my mind for a while now, and the recent Mars landing has brought it back again (and I can't think of anyone else to ask) so here goes... This is regarding the 7 minutes of terror: Do you think that it is possible for NASA to build signal amplifiers that would be strategically placed between Mars and Earth, and these would boost the signal enough to reduce the delay in communication time? Or is this still too far in the future? I'm thinking 2 or 3 satellites spaced evenly across the distance whose purpose is to catch and slingshot the signals back and forth... Thank you for your response (provided you get this message, or for anyone else who may have a theory/answer).

    Derrick FyffeDerrick Fyffe5 ngày trước
    • The delay is because of the finite speed of light. There's nothing that can be done about that.

      AtlasAtlas4 ngày trước
  • Don't you think the next lander will have highly AI assisted landing if not completely AI assisted landing? Although I agree that manual intervention from the onboard astronauts might be necessary and hence the training on earth is necessary.

    Chinmoy KatharChinmoy Kathar5 ngày trước
  • I WANNA SEE THIS CARTOON! MAKE IT HAPEN!

    Travis WeideTravis Weide5 ngày trước
  • What a brilliant video. Thank you.

    Peter HoarePeter Hoare5 ngày trước
  • I couldnt find video of the crane attached llrv anywhere else. Where did you get the LLRF-LLRV footage, if you can/want to answer?

    Sadrho GollsodiaSadrho Gollsodia5 ngày trước
  • Never heard of the X14 either - wow.

    Mac KettnerMac Kettner5 ngày trước
  • Thank you for that video that was awesome I am a space not even though I am not able to go into space but that is so cool that we had that and I bet if we go back to the moon like they want us to we need that version of or a new version of training aid

    curtuswcurtusw5 ngày trước
  • Thanks, dude.

    JustJoe OlesonJustJoe Oleson5 ngày trước
  • 1:44 ⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌ ⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌ ⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌ ⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪ ⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔ ⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘ ⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎ ⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗ ⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷ ⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟ ⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰ ⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊ ⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌ ⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁ ⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀ ⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀ ⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟ ⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾ ⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽

    D. SkučasD. Skučas5 ngày trước
    • spooky

      AtlasAtlas5 ngày trước
  • Moon landings were faked, hate to break the news.

    Dick RigglesDick Riggles5 ngày trước
    • Ha! You’re an ignorant moron. You know NOTHING about the engineering involved.

      Brad WooldidgeBrad Wooldidge5 ngày trước
    • Hate to break it to you but you are an idiot.

      Kyle LaurentKyle Laurent5 ngày trước
    • @Atlas Seriously, do some thinking and use logic...

      Dick RigglesDick Riggles5 ngày trước
    • Wrong.

      AtlasAtlas5 ngày trước
  • Man I'm excited for this series!

    Bastian NyströmBastian Nyström5 ngày trước
  • tgagyg

    W BixW Bix5 ngày trước
  • This was such an amazing technical feat that mankind accomplished. Thank you for taking the time for making this video and doing in depth research, analysis, and interviews with folks that were involved in the space program. Side note: Sad to see almost 1k flat earthers have shown up.

    Nate ShanksNate Shanks5 ngày trước
  • I love getting smarter everyday with your videos

    Patrick RudolphPatrick Rudolph5 ngày trước
  • 1:58

    DeltaBravoDeltaBravo5 ngày trước
VIworld